Women in agricultural societies continue to face the double burden of household work and work in the farms. The daily drudgery of carrying water from long distances, collecting firewood, cleaning, cooking and taking care of the family besides performing the backbreaking manual tasks of working in the farms takes a toll on their health. However, women continue to be unrecognised as farmers with no rights to the lands on which they work and their work continues to remain invisible at the policy level.
Climate change has been found to further exacerbate the burden of women. For example, climate change induced extreme weather events such as droughts, while having adverse effects on people’s physical and mental health affects women even more than men owing to multiple social, political, and cultural factors.
This is because many of the tasks that women do require interactions with natural resources affected by drought. Women in rural areas are at particular risk, as there is typically more interface with the environmental risks.
A drought can be defined as:
“An extended period—a season, a year, or several years—of deficient precipitation compared to the statistical multi-year average for a region that results in water shortage for some activity, group, or environmental sector”.
Droughts are classified into the following categories:
This classification of droughts is very useful to measure drought frequency, severity, and duration.
Read our FAQs to know more about droughts here
Studies show that droughts affect women more adversely and women are hit the hardest due to lack of clean water and changes in diet. They suffer from a range of health problems such as fever, weakness and reproductive health issues.
Drought-induced crop and income losses force many women, especially from poor tribal areas to take up less productive and low-remunerative activities such as subsistence farming, collecting forest produce, undertaking seasonal works and participating in public employment. Women compromise the most when it comes to food distribution in times of crisis and they cope by eating less or adjusting portions of food.
There is also a growing body of evidence that has highlighted the linkages between extreme climate shocks and women’s experience of violence, including intimate partner violence (IPV), sexual assault, female genital mutilation, honor killing, and the trafficking of women.
However, few studies have examined the relationship between droughts and IPV informs this paper titled 'Climate and gender: Association between droughts and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)' authored by
Nabamallika Dehingia, Lotus McDougal, Jay G. Silverman, Elizabeth Reed, Lianne Urada, Julian McAuley, Abhishek Singh and Anita Raj
published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.
All prior studies that have looked at the relationship between drought and IPV have used meteorological drought, which fails to capture the actual impacts felt by the community due to the rainfall-related aberrations. This study used two separate definitions of drought—meteorological or precipitation-based drought and socioeconomic drought— for a robust assessment of the relationship between drought and IPV.
The country has experienced 2 major drought periods since 1990, in 1997–2004 and 2011–2015. India was also found to be one of the severely drought-impacted countries for 2020–2022, with two-thirds of the country’s land area experiencing droughts. In addition to extreme health and social impacts, drought episodes during 1998–2017 were estimated to reduce India’s gross domestic product by 2–5 percent.
There are significant differences across the country with regard to precipitation levels and drought status, and in many areas not historically prone to drought, precipitation levels have been decreasing consistently over the past 10 years.
The study analysed data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) from the nationally representative household surveys conducted in 2015–2016 (NFHS-4) and 2019–2021 (NFHS-5).
These findings support the growing body of evidence regarding the relationship between climate change and women’s vulnerability, and highlight the need for gender responsive strategies for disaster management and preparedness in the future, argues the paper.